← Benchmark centerVERSIONED EVIDENCE CONTRACT

GlyphCAS Identity and Reuse

No public result exists merely because this contract exists. It defines what must be run, recorded, and disclosed before a result can be promoted.

Read related paper

REQUIRED SUITES

Exact blob and canonical subset
Paraphrase semantic alias fixtures
Project and authority isolation
Dependency invalidation
Receipt-chain verification
Representation recipe verification
Early-exit and full-inference fallback
Adversarial false-reuse cases

INVALID-RUN CONDITIONS

semantic candidate promoted to exact identity
cross-project reuse without contract
stale dependency accepted
receipt chain break
approximation unlabeled

METRICS

exact_hit_ratesemantic_reuse_precisionfalse_reuse_ratecompiler_mslookup_msfull_inference_avoidedinvalidation_accuracyproof_recovery

EXAMPLE RECEIPT · NOT MEASURED

{
  "run_id": "b03-glyphcas-example-NOT-MEASURED",
  "suite_id": "b03-glyphcas",
  "suite_version": "1.0.0",
  "commit": "UNSET",
  "configuration_digest": "UNSET",
  "corpus_or_task_digest": "UNSET",
  "model_and_runtime": {},
  "environment_digest": "UNSET",
  "started_at": null,
  "finished_at": null,
  "raw_artifact_refs": [],
  "metric_records": [],
  "invalid_conditions_checked": [],
  "known_limitations": [
    "Example only; no measured values."
  ],
  "result_state": "AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN",
  "receipt_digest": "UNSET",
  "example_only": true
}

CI FIXTURE RECEIPTDETERMINISTIC FIXTURE CONFORMANCE

Contract structure and example-receipt invariants only. No metric was measured and no benchmark result was promoted.

{
  "checks": {
    "example_cannot_be_measured": true,
    "invalid_conditions_declared": true,
    "metrics_declared": true,
    "receipt_contract_complete": true,
    "receipt_suite_matches": true,
    "related_paper_present": true,
    "required_suites_declared": true,
    "suite_id_matches_directory": true,
    "suite_version_present": true
  },
  "contract_sha256": "497950762457ac9424e66dac032cdc0e524eadb90fb314ec5df7730fe3b7b89b",
  "measured_metrics": false,
  "note": "This receipt validates the benchmark contract fixture only. It is not a benchmark run and contains no performance or comparative result.",
  "performance_result": false,
  "result_state": "DETERMINISTIC_FIXTURE_CONFORMANCE",
  "suite_id": "b03-glyphcas",
  "suite_version": "1.0.0"
}

RELATED IMPORTED EVIDENCE

These records retain their own scope and limitations. They do not cause every suite in this broader contract to pass.

E-GLYPHCAS-DESIGN-REPORTSOURCE REVIEWED

GlyphCAS design report

Source report supporting the typed identity, deterministic canonicalization, reuse, and proof architecture.

The public paper does not establish universal canonicalization, universal cache reuse, or production latency gains.
Source bytes remain behind the paper's public-disclosure boundary.

E-FOVEA-OOC-ASSESSMENTSOURCE REVIEWED

GlyphDrive/FOVEA/OOC technical assessment

Technical assessment and v0.2 research plan supporting narrow mechanism claims and explicit future gates.

Founder-local Rust conformance, full codec baselines, and cognition experiments remain unrun.

Objective

Establish a reproducible, falsifiable evidence path for p05-glyphcas. This contract authorizes no result by itself. A public result requires a versioned run, exact configuration, raw artifacts, environment identity, limitations, and a receipt.

Required suites

Exact blob and canonical subset
Paraphrase semantic alias fixtures
Project and authority isolation
Dependency invalidation
Receipt-chain verification
Representation recipe verification
Early-exit and full-inference fallback
Adversarial false-reuse cases

Invalid-run conditions

A run is invalid, rather than merely low-scoring, when any of the following occurs:

semantic candidate promoted to exact identity
cross-project reuse without contract
stale dependency accepted
receipt chain break
approximation unlabeled

Metrics

Report each metric separately. Do not hide a regression inside one composite score.

exact_hit_rate
semantic_reuse_precision
false_reuse_rate
compiler_ms
lookup_ms
full_inference_avoided
invalidation_accuracy
proof_recovery

Baseline discipline

Use the strongest sensible baseline for the exact task and information budget. Pin versions, prompts, corpora, models, hardware, runtime flags, and warm/cold state. If the research system receives additional context, dependencies, precomputation, or a model, charge or disclose them under the contract.

Run receipt

Every run emits:

run_id
suite_id
suite_version
commit
configuration_digest
corpus_or_task_digest
model_and_runtime
environment_digest
started_at
finished_at
raw_artifact_refs[]
metric_records[]
invalid_conditions_checked[]
known_limitations[]
result_state
receipt_digest

Allowed result states:

REPRODUCED
VERIFIED_MECHANISM
IMPLEMENTED
SOURCE_REVIEWED
SPECIFIED
HYPOTHESIS
INCONCLUSIVE
FAILED
AWAITING_LOCAL_RUN
INVALID

Data splits and leakage

Freeze task sets before viewing final results. Keep development, selection, and held-out evaluation separate where the suite supports them. Record any human-authored fixture that appeared during implementation. Do not tune a threshold on the final set and present it as held out.

Statistical and qualitative reporting

For repeated measurements, report sample count, central tendency, dispersion, and uncertainty appropriate to the design. Preserve row-level results. For human ratings, blind condition labels where possible, record the rubric, and retain disagreement rather than averaging away failure modes.

Negative evidence

Failed and inconclusive runs remain in the experiment ledger with code, configuration, and reason. A later successful run does not delete them.

Publication requirements

A public result page must show:

exact evidence state;
date and commit;
environment and task/corpus identity;
metric table;
baseline table;
raw artifact links;
failure gallery;
limitations and non-claims;
reproduction command;
receipt digest.

No marketing page may round a measured result into a broader claim than the contract supports.